1-20 of 9151
Select how you would like to sort the search results
Journal Article
Christine Nyaga and others
Database, Volume 2025, 2025, baaf074, https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaf074
Published: 17 November 2025
Image
Published: 17 November 2025
Figure 1. Difference in UC values from using GPCP and GEBV models across 40 breeding cycles. The plot is divided into five columns showing simulations run with different mean DD values (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4), and three rows indicating different number of advanced crosses. The colored trend lines indicate diffe
Image
Published: 17 November 2025
Figure 3. Trait performance of selected and unselected yam progeny using GPCP. Boxplots show standardized values for (a) yield per plant (Yield), (b) tuber length, (c) ATW, and (d) YMV. Selection decisions (selected vs. unselecteD) were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, with all traits showing significa
Image
Published: 17 November 2025
Figure 4. The input page of the GPCP tool showing different user interface elements. (a) Available datasets checkmarked to show the selected dataset for further analysis. (b) Available factors are loaded once ‘Proceed to Factor Selection’ is clicked. Options to choose from include ‘fixed’, ‘random’, and ‘None
Image
Published: 17 November 2025
Figure 2. Difference in mean heterozygosity values from using GPCP and GEBV models across 40 breeding cycles. The plot is divided into five columns showing simulations run with different mean DD values (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4), and three rows indicating different number of advanced crosses. The colored trend lin
Journal Article
Revathy Menon and others
Database, Volume 2025, 2025, baaf072, https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaf072
Published: 13 November 2025
Image
Published: 13 November 2025
Figure 2. SCOPe class distribution of single-member superfamilies and multi-member superfamilies in PASS2.8. The all alpha ( ) class is the most represented class in single-member superfamilies, and the alpha and beta ( ) protein class is the most represented class in multi-member superfamilies.
Image
Published: 13 November 2025
Figure 1. Workflow followed in PASS2.8. Superfamily alignments that do not meet the alignment assessment criteria undergo clustering of domains. The results of the clustering lead to ‘split superfamilies’, which are independently passed through the pipeline again. Domains identified as outliers with no parent
Image
Published: 13 November 2025
Figure 3. Plot representing the changes in the average gap percentage of the problematic cases presented by superfamilies. The superfamilies shown here are representative cases, and the full details are provided in Supplementary Table S1 . The x-axis comprises superfamilies arranged by SCOPe class. The SCOPe
Image
Published: 13 November 2025
Figure 4. Detailed studies of four problematic superfamilies requiring re-alignment with the PASS2 protocol. (a) The CoA-dependent acyl transferases superfamily (i) contains four families and automatically matched domains without family annotations, termed as ‘automated matches’. (ii) The k-means clustering a
Image
Published: 31 October 2025
Figure 4. Data statistics for cell organelles. ‘Not reported’ sub-cellular location, termed here as a separate category is not shown.
Image
Published: 31 October 2025
Figure 7. Distribution of enzyme classes in this database. Numbers of entries in each category are shown. The reactions catalysed by the respective enzyme classes are shown on the right-hand side.
Image
Published: 31 October 2025
Figure 11. Database example output against the query—UniProt ID: ‘P00445’; returned in a tabular format (upper panel). Cytoscape-generated interactome image (lower panel).
Image
Published: 31 October 2025
Figure 2. InTxDB database home page and statistics of datasets.
Image
Published: 31 October 2025
Figure 4. LCDD interface—search results.
Image
Published: 31 October 2025
Figure 7. The statistics of using liposomal carriers for (A) therapeutic, (B) diagnostic, and (C) theranostic applications (NR denotes ‘not reported’).
Image
Published: 31 October 2025
Figure 8. The statistics of the most frequently used cargoes based on their types, including (A) chemical compounds, (B) lipid compounds, (C) nanoparticles, (D) nucleic acids, and (E) proteins and peptides.
Journal Article
Yanyan Zhu and others
Database, Volume 2025, 2025, baaf070, https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaf070
Published: 31 October 2025
Journal Article
Marziyeh Mousazadeh and others
Database, Volume 2025, 2025, baaf042, https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaf042
Published: 31 October 2025
Image
Published: 31 October 2025
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of Cys-PTMs involved in ROS-related activities: ROS scavenging (—|) and ROS producing (→).