Abstract

Oomycetes form a unique group of the fungal-like, aquatic, eukaryotic microorganisms. Lifestyle and pathogenicity of the oomycetes are diverse. Many pathogenic oomycetes affect a broad range of plants and cause enormous economic loss annually. Some pathogenic oomycetes cause destructive and deadly diseases in a variety of animals, including humans. No effective antimicrobial agent against the oomycetes is available. Genomic data of many oomycetes are currently available. Comparative analyses of the oomycete genomes must be performed to better understand the oomycete biology and virulence, as well as to identify conserved and biologically important proteins that are potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets of these organisms. However, a tool that facilitates comparative genomic studies of the oomycetes is lacking. Here, we described in detail the Oomycete Gene Table, which is an online user-friendly bioinformatic tool, designed to search, analyze, compare and visualize gene contents of 20 oomycetes in a customizable table. Genomic contents of other oomycete species, when available, can be added to the existing database. Some of the applications of the Oomycete Gene Table include investigations of phylogenomic relationships, as well as identifications of biologically important and pathogenesis-related genes of oomycetes. In summary, the Oomycete Gene Table is a simple and useful tool for comparative genomic analyses of oomycetes.

Introduction

Oomycetes are fungal-like, aquatic, eukaryotic microorganisms that belong to the stramenopiles–alveolates–Rhizaria supergroup (1). Oomycetes include the organisms of the genera Albugo, Aphanomyces, Bremia, Hyaloperonospora, Lagenidium, Peronospora, Phytophthora, Phytopythium, Plasmopara, Pythium and Saprolegnia (2, 3). Lifestyle and pathogenicity of the oomycetes are diverse. Many pathogenic oomycetes (e.g. Phytophthora and Pythium species) affect a broad range of plants and cause enormous economic loss each year (4). Some pathogenic oomycetes (e.g. Pythium insidiosum, Pythium aphanidermatum, Aphanomyces invadans, Saprolegnia parasitica and Lagenidium species) infect a variety of animals, including humans, and can lead to a deadly disease (5–10). No effective antimicrobial agent against oomycetes is available, making the control of infections caused by these organisms difficult and challenging.

Genomes of many oomycetes have been sequenced and deposited in public repositories, such as the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), the DNA Data Bank of Japan and the European Bioinformatics Institute (6, 11–22). Availability of the genome data provides opportunities to explore biology, pathogenicity and evolution of oomycetes, which can lead to the discovery of a novel method for efficient control of the infections caused by these organisms. Comparative analyses of oomycete genomes must be performed to better understand the oomycete biology and virulence, as well as to identify conserved and biologically important proteins that are potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets of these organisms. An array of bioinformatic tools and well-trained personals are usually required for such complicated analyses. A few web-based tools, such as FungiDB (23) and EuMicrobeDBLite (24), have been developed for genomic analysis of oomycetes. These online tools provide bioinformatic features, which include sequence retrieval, basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) search engine, gene annotation, gene location and gene and protein architecture. However, a bioinformatic tool that facilitates the comparative genomic studies of oomycetes is still lacking.

Recently, we have developed an online user-friendly bioinformatic tool, called ‘Oomycete Gene Table’, to facilitate the comparative genomic analysis of the human pathogen P. insidiosum and 19 other oomycetes, as well as 2 diatoms (3). The Oomycete Gene Table can be used to search, retrieve, sort, filter, compare and display gene contents of the oomycete genome(s) of interest in a customizable and easy-to-understand table. The Oomycete Gene Table has been successfully used to investigate the phylogenomic relationships and identify the conserve and species-specific genes of P. insidiosum (3, 25). As only a few bioinformatic tools for oomycetes are available, the Oomycete Gene Table is an additional, simple and useful tool that can be applied for the genomic analyses of oomycetes. The key features of the Oomycete Gene Table are described in detail here to facilitate its utilization for genomic analyses of oomycetes. The Oomycete Gene Table is available online at http://www.sbi.kmutt.ac.th/cgi-bin/gt/viewer?organism=oomycetes&build=190208.

Contents of the Oomycete Gene Table

The Oomycete Gene Table was constructed based on sequence similarity analyses of gene contents from 20 oomycetes and 2 diatoms, using an algorithm described by Kittichotirat et al. (26). Briefly, genes were clustered based on four different BLAST strategies using E-value of ≤10−6, pairwise sequence identity of ≥30% and pairwise sequence alignment coverage of ≥50% (3). This clustering process was iterated until the gene members of all clusters are stable or no longer change. The Oomycete Gene Table contains a total of 382 450 protein-coding genes from these 22 microorganisms, which have been grouped into 105 541 unique gene clusters. In the Oomycete Gene Table, the rows show gene clusters while the columns show (i) Row numbers, (ii) Cluster identification numbers (ID), (iii) Annotations based on Clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COG) (27, 28), (iv) Functional descriptions, (v) Expected gene lengths and (vi) the organism names included in the table (Figure 1). Cluster IDs are unique identifiers that have been assigned to each of the 105 541 gene clusters (p-cluster000001-105541).

Figure 1

Components of the Oomycete Gene Table. Each row represents a gene cluster. Several columns are arranged to present (i) Row numbers, (ii) Cluster identification numbers, (iii) COG, (iv) Functional descriptions, (v) Expected gene lengths and (vi) organism names (e.g. 20 oomycetes and 2 diatoms). Percent completeness of a gene in each cell is indicated by color shading. A light-gray cell shows that a sequence with significant similarity (but without a complete open reading frame) is identified in a particular organism. A black cell indicates that no gene is identified in the corresponding genome.

In the ‘COG annotation’ column, each code represents different COG-based protein description (e.g. COG0514 is for Superfamily II DNA helicase; COG1960 is for Acyl-CoA dehydrogenases; and COG0828 is for Ribosomal protein S21). Each COG annotation was assigned based on a BLASTP analysis of the longest protein from each gene cluster against the COG database (the BLASTP setting: sequence coverage ≥80%; protein identity ≥30%) (27, 28). The letter in square brackets indicates a COG category (e.g. [A] is for RNA processing and modification, [I] is for Lipid transport and metabolism and [K] is for Transcription). The ‘Functional description’ column displays protein functional information of the gene clusters. Each gene cluster functional description is assigned based on the most represented functional annotation among the gene members within the cluster (i.e. majority rule). Note that gene functional annotations from source databases (e.g. FungiDB, NCBI and Joint Genome Institute) are directly used without any modification for consistency purpose. The ‘Expected gene length’ column indicates the length (in base pairs) of the longest gene in each gene cluster.

Each cell in the Oomycete Gene Table provides status and data of an individual gene, such as, gene ID, length, location, CG content, annotation and sequence download links (both DNA and Protein). In each gene cluster, a light-gray cell indicates that one organism contains a sequence without a complete open reading frame that has significant sequence similarity to the genes of other organisms in the corresponding gene cluster. The lack of a complete open reading frame (or a gene) in one organism but not in the other organisms may be due to the evolutionary loss of that particular gene from the genome or the incompleteness of the analyzed genome sequence. A black cell indicates that a gene or a similar sequence is absent from an organism.

User interface

The user interface of the Oomycete Gene Table comprises six drop-down windows (Figure 2), which can be used to search, analyze and display the gene contents of the organisms included in the Oomycete Gene Table. The ‘Show all options’ and ‘Hide all options’ buttons can be used, respectively, to show and hide the ‘query input’ boxes and customizable options. The ‘Refresh Gene Table’ button can be used to update the data display of the Oomycete Gene Table according to the currently selected options. All display parameters can be managed and customized as described in detail below.

Figure 2

User interface of the Oomycete Gene Table comprises of six drop-down windows: (a) Keyword search, (b) BLAST search, (c) Row sorting and cell coloring options, (d) Row filtering options, (e) Column (s) to display and (f) Show genes only present in.

Keyword Search

Keywords can be used to search the gene contents stored in the Oomycete Gene Table (Figure 2a). Such keywords are cluster ID (e.g. p-cluster007458 and p-cluster024940), COG IDs (e.g. COG0225, COG2183 and COG5188) or protein/gene name, protein/gene family name or protein/gene identification number (e.g. chitinase, exo1 and THAPS_005625). Multiple keywords can be used simultaneously to search the Oomycete Gene Table by separating the keywords with a comma, for example, ‘p-cluster000001, THAPS_005625, adhesin (Figure 3). Keyword search can be performed on the whole Oomycete Gene Table or focused on a specific genome by selecting from the drop-down box accordingly.

Figure 3

The ‘Keyword search’ window of the Oomycete Gene Table: (a) a single or combined keyword(s) (e.g. cluster ID, COG number and protein/gene name) can be entered in the ‘input’ box for searching the genomic data of all 22 organisms and (b) the Oomycete Gene Table shows a search result of the matched gene contents of all or selected genomes.

BLAST search

For the ‘BLAST search’ window (Figure 2b), either a DNA or a protein query sequence can be entered to search for its homologous sequences in the genomes that are available in the Oomycete Gene Table. Currently, only one sequence is allowed in each search. The BLAST search result shows matched organism(s), gene/protein names, bit score(s) and E-value(s). Each significant match is supplemented with a link to pairwise sequence alignment of the query and subject sequences, as well as a link to view on the Oomycete Gene Table.

Row sorting and cell coloring

The number, order and cell color of the displayed gene clusters can be managed and customized using the ‘Row sorting and cell coloring’ options (Figure 2c). By default, the Oomycete Gene Table shows 50 rows of gene clusters per page in ascending order of the Cluster IDs. The cells in the displayed table are color coded to indicate the percentage of gene completeness as compared to the Expected gene length (which is the longest gene in each gene cluster). In addition to the Cluster IDs, the displayed gene clusters can be sorted according to COG annotations, functional descriptions, expected gene lengths and gene positions of a selected organism (Figure 4a). In addition, each organism name shown in the column header can be clicked to show sorting options based on gene positions or gene copy numbers in the corresponding genome (Figure 4b). The cells of the Oomycete Gene Table can be marked with different colors to demonstrate the selected property of the displayed genes (e.g. percentage of gene completeness, gene order in a genome, gene copy number or CG content) (Figure 4c).

Figure 4

The ‘Row sorting and cell coloring’ options of the Oomycete Gene Table. Display of the gene clusters and their associated data can be customized, arranged and sorted based on: (a) cluster IDs, functional annotations, expected gene lengths and COG categories; (b) position or copy number of gene(s) in the genome; and (c) a selected property, such as gene completeness, gene order in a genome, gene copy number or CG content.

Row filtering

The ‘Row filtering’ options can be used to filter the gene contents and list only the gene clusters with a desired COG category (Figure 2d). The drop-down window shows COG functional categories (27, 28) together with numbers and percentages of gene clusters that have been assigned to them (Figure 5). A minimal length of the displayed genes can be specified by putting in a desired gene length (in base pairs) in the provided space. There are also options for displaying clusters that contain genes that are located within 300 bp from the ends of the genomic contigs (an asterisk is marked in the cell) as well as genes with possible frameshift mutation (the letter ‘F’ is marked in the cell).

Figure 5

The ‘Row filtering’ options of the Oomycete Gene Table. The drop-down window is used to customize and display only gene clusters with a desired COG category. The COG codes (e.g. [D], [M] and [N]), together with the number and percentage of each gene cluster identified in the organism(s) are listed.

‘Column(s) to display’ and ‘Show genes only present in’ options

The Oomycete Gene Table is set by default to display the gene contents of all organisms (see the organism columns in Figure 1). However, users can select and show only gene contents of the organism(s) of interest by checking the desired organism(s) shown in the ‘Column(s) to display’ box (Figure 2e). For example, when ‘Phytophthora infestans’ and ‘Pythium ultimum’ are checked, only gene contents of these two organisms are displayed upon refreshing the Oomycete Gene Table. Links to the source databases of the available genomes are also provided in this box.

The ‘Show genes only present in’ window (Figure 2f) can be used to display genes that are present only in the selected organism(s). For example, when ‘Pythium insidiosum’ is checked, a total of 998 P. insidiosum-specific gene clusters are shown in the Oomycete Gene Table. If multiple organisms are selected, only the gene clusters that are present in the selected organisms and absent from the other unselected organisms are displayed. For example, when ‘Pythium insidiosum’ and ‘Pythium aphanidermatum’ are checked, a total of 91 gene clusters that are specific to just these two oomycetes are shown. In addition, if the ‘All genomes (Core genes)’ box is checked, only the set of gene clusters that are present in all organisms are visualized. In contrast, if the ‘Some genomes (Variable genes)’ box is checked, only gene clusters that are present in at least one but not all of the organisms are displayed.

Retrieval of genomic data

Various genomic data can be retrieved from the Oomycete Gene Table. By clicking a cluster ID of interest (e.g. p-cluster097753; Figure 6a), a pop-up window that contains links for obtaining an overview as well as displaying sequences (in FASTA format) of all genes/proteins belonging to the corresponding gene cluster is shown. The overview page contains detail of gene members such as genome IDs, gene/contig IDs, gene locations, gene lengths, functional descriptions, links to gene/protein sequences, links to source databases and links to NCBI Protein-BLAST tool (Figure 6b). This information can also be retrieved by clicking a cell on the displayed Oomycete Gene Table. For example, Figure 6c shows the retrievable gene data of ‘Saprolegnia declina’ that is found in the gene cluster ‘p-cluster097753’.

Figure 6

Genomic data retrieval features of the Oomycete Gene Table: (a) when a gene cluster ID is selected, several links are shown as gateways to access the genomic data of all organisms contained in that gene cluster; (b) overview genomic data includes genome IDs, contig/gene IDs, genomic location and length of the genes, functional annotations, links to gene/protein sequences, links to source databases and links to NCBI Protein-BLAST tool; and (c) when an individual cell is selected, the genomic data of an individual organism can be obtained.

Discussion

Gene gain, loss and modification can accumulatively occur in different genomes and contribute to variations in lifestyles, pathogenicity and host specificities of the saprophytic and pathogenic oomycetes. Genome sequences of many oomycetes (6, 11–22) are now available and serve as an important resource for comparative genomic studies. Among the microbiologists and researchers in the field of oomycete molecular genetics, the lack of bioinformatic experiences and technical skills limits their capabilities to thoroughly use the available genome data to explore biology, pathogenicity and evolution of oomycetes. We have developed an online user-friendly bioinformatic tool called ‘Oomycete Gene Table’ to facilitate comparative analysis and data retrieval of oomycete genomes (3). The interface of the Oomycete Gene Table has been designed for users who are unfamiliar with or have limited experiences in big data mining and analysis of multiple genomes.

A large repertoire of ~380 000 genes from 20 oomycetes and 2 diatom genomes that have been grouped into ~100 000 homologous gene clusters can be found and analyzed in the Oomycete Gene Table. A number of useful features have been implemented, which allow users to easily search, retrieve and compare gene(s) of interest across the available genomes. Core genes of selected oomycetes can be extracted from the Oomycete Gene Table for phylogenomic analyses. Some core genes of oomycetes can be potential targets for drug design and development. Species-specific genes are important for elucidating the lifestyle and pathogenicity of a particular oomycete. For example, unlike most other pathogenic oomycetes that infect plants, P. insidiosum and P. aphanidermatum are capable of infecting humans. The Oomycete Gene Table can identify ~90 gene clusters that are only present in these two oomycetes, which may possibly contribute to their specific virulence in the human host.

Other applications of the Oomycete Gene Table include the identification of elicitins (3) and ureases (25) among oomycetes. Elicitins form a protein family that is originally identified in Phytophthora and Pythium species but not in other oomycetes or other organisms (29–31). The Oomycete Gene Table has been used to explore the presence of elicitins in various oomycetes (3). By simply using the keyword ‘elicitin’ in a search (as demonstrated in Figure 3), the result shows that Phytophthora and Pythium species contain a more extensive repertoire of the elicitin genes than the other oomycetes. Regarding the ureases, some pathogens (e.g. the bacterium Helicobacter pylori and the fungus Cryptococcus neoformans) produce urease as a virulence factor to facilitate their pathogenesis (32–34). Since the role of urease in biology and pathogenesis of oomycetes has not been characterized, the Oomycete Gene Table was searched by using the keyword ‘urease’ to identify urease-encoding genes in oomycetes (25). The proper function of urease requires the presence of several urease accessory proteins (e.g. urease accessory protein D, F and G) (35). The Oomycete Gene Table shows that although the ureases are conserved in oomycetes, the presence of urease accessory protein-encoding genes are markedly diverse in these organisms (25).

As shown above, the Oomycete Gene Table is a useful bioinformatic tool. However, it is important to note that the quality of the genome sequences included in the database, all of which are still incomplete, may compromise the reliability of analysis results. For example, an absence of a gene in one organism may actually be due to a missing or unknown genome sequence. It is also important to note that since genome data in the Oomycete Gene Table are obtained from various public resources, they may not be annotated with the same annotation pipeline. Users should always consider these limitations when interpreting the comparative analysis results. As genome sequencing technologies continue to improve in term of cost and efficiency, better quality genome sequences of oomycetes will be available and can be added into the Oomycete Gene Table to improve the database quality.

In conclusion, we described here the Oomycete Gene Table, which is an online bioinformatic tool for comparative analysis and data retrieval of oomycete genomes. The Oomycete Gene Table is accessible via a web browser, and its functionalities can be operated via an easy-to-use interface. The inexperienced users (e.g. microbiologists, researchers and clinicians) in the field can seamlessly analyze and compare the big data of multiple oomycete genomes. The genomic data in the Oomycete Gene Table will be updated regularly to increase their completeness and accuracy, which will allow the Oomycete Gene Table to serve as a useful bioinformatic tool for exploring the biology, pathogenicity and evolution of oomycetes.

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University [Grant number CF_60001]; Thailand Research Fund [Grant number BRG5980009]; King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi through the ‘KMUTT 55th Anniversary Commemorative Fund’. The funding agencies have no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data and the writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest. None declared.

Database URL:http://www.sbi.kmutt.ac.th/cgi-bin/gt/viewer?organism=oomycetes&build=190208

References

1.

Burki
,
F.
(
2014
)
The eukaryotic tree of life from a global phylogenomic perspective
.
Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.
,
6
,
a016147
.

2.

Kamoun
,
S.
(
2003
)
Molecular genetics of pathogenic oomycetes
.
Eukaryot. Cell
,
2
,
191
199
.

3.

Rujirawat
,
T.
,
Patumcharoenpol
,
P.
,
Lohnoo
,
T.
et al.  (
2018
)
Probing the phylogenomics and putative pathogenicity genes of Pythium insidiosum by oomycete genome analyses
.
Sci. Rep.
,
8
,
4135
.

4.

Kamoun
,
S.
,
Furzer
,
O.
,
Jones
,
J.D.G.
et al.  (
2015
)
The top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology
.
Mol. Plant Pathol.
,
16
,
413
434
.

5.

Beakes
,
G.W.
,
Glockling
,
S.L.
and
Sekimoto
,
S.
(
2012
)
The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete ‘fungi’
.
Protoplasma
,
249
,
3
19
.

6.

Jiang
,
R.H.Y.
,
de Bruijn
,
I.
,
Haas
,
B.J.
et al.  (
2013
)
Distinctive expansion of potential virulence genes in the genome of the oomycete fish pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica
.
PLoS Genet.
,
9
,
e1003272
.

7.

Krajaejun
,
T.
,
Sathapatayavongs
,
B.
,
Pracharktam
,
R.
et al.  (
2006
)
Clinical and epidemiological analyses of human pythiosis in Thailand
.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
,
43
,
569
576
.

8.

Calvano
,
T.P.
,
Blatz
,
P.J.
,
Vento
,
T.J.
et al.  (
2011
)
Pythium aphanidermatum infection following combat trauma
.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
,
49
,
3710
3713
.

9.

Reinprayoon
,
U.
,
Permpalung
,
N.
,
Kasetsuwan
,
N.
et al.  (
2013
)
Lagenidium sp. ocular infection mimicking ocular pythiosis
.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
,
51
,
2778
2780
.

10.

Mendoza
,
L.
,
Ajello
,
L.
and
McGinnis
,
M.R.
(
1996
)
Infection caused by the oomycetous pathogen Pythium insidiosum
.
J. Mycol. Med.
,
6
,
151
164
.

11.

Ascunce
,
M.S.
,
Huguet-Tapia
,
J.C.
,
Braun
,
E.L.
et al.  (
2016
)
Whole genome sequence of the emerging oomycete pathogen Pythium insidiosum strain CDC-B5653 isolated from an infected human in the USA
.
Genom. Data
,
7
,
60
61
.

12.

McCarthy
,
C.G.P.
and
Fitzpatrick
,
D.A.
(
2017
)
Phylogenomic reconstruction of the oomycete phylogeny derived from 37 genomes
.
mSphere
,
2
,
e00095
17
.

13.

Baxter
,
L.
,
Tripathy
,
S.
,
Ishaque
,
N.
et al.  (
2010
)
Signatures of adaptation to obligate biotrophy in the Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis genome
.
Science
,
330
,
1549
1551
.

14.

Haas
,
B.J.
,
Kamoun
,
S.
,
Zody
,
M.C.
et al.  (
2009
)
Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans
.
Nature
,
461
,
393
398
.

15.

Lamour
,
K.H.
,
Mudge
,
J.
,
Gobena
,
D.
et al.  (
2012
)
Genome sequencing and mapping reveal loss of heterozygosity as a mechanism for rapid adaptation in the vegetable pathogen Phytophthora capsici
.
Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.
,
25
,
1350
1360
.

16.

Waugh
,
M.
,
Hraber
,
P.
,
Weller
,
J.
et al.  (
2000
)
The phytophthora genome initiative database: informatics and analysis for distributed pathogenomic research
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
28
,
87
90
.

17.

Tyler
,
B.M.
,
Tripathy
,
S.
,
Zhang
,
X.
et al.  (
2006
)
Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis
.
Science
,
313
,
1261
1266
.

18.

Lévesque
,
C.A.
,
Brouwer
,
H.
,
Cano
,
L.
et al.  (
2010
)
Genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant pathogen Pythium ultimum reveals original pathogenicity mechanisms and effector repertoire
.
Genome Biol.
,
11
,
R73
.

19.

Rujirawat
,
T.
,
Patumcharoenpol
,
P.
,
Lohnoo
,
T.
et al.  (
2015
)
Draft genome sequence of the pathogenic oomycete Pythium insidiosum strain Pi-S, isolated from a patient with pythiosis
.
Genome Announc.
,
3
,
e00574
e00515
.

20.

Adhikari
,
B.N.
,
Hamilton
,
J.P.
,
Zerillo
,
M.M.
et al.  (
2013
)
Comparative genomics reveals insight into virulence strategies of plant pathogenic oomycetes
.
PLoS One
,
8
,
e75072
.

21.

Kittichotirat
,
W.
,
Patumcharoenpol
,
P.
,
Rujirawat
,
T.
et al.  (
2017
)
Draft genome and sequence variant data of the oomycete Pythium insidiosum strain Pi45 from the phylogenetically-distinct clade-III
.
Data Brief
,
15
,
896
900
.

22.

Patumcharoenpol
,
P.
,
Rujirawat
,
T.
,
Lohnoo
,
T.
et al.  (
2018
)
Draft genome sequences of the oomycete Pythium insidiosum strain CBS 573.85 from a horse with pythiosis and strain CR02 from the environment
.
Data Brief
,
16
,
47
50
.

23.

Stajich
,
J.E.
,
Harris
,
T.
,
Brunk
,
B.P.
et al.  (
2012
)
FungiDB: an integrated functional genomics database for fungi
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
40
,
D675
D681
.

24.

Panda
,
A.
,
Sen
,
D.
,
Ghosh
,
A.
et al.  (
2016
)
EuMicrobedbLite: a lightweight genomic resource and analytic platform for draft oomycete genomes
.
Mol. Plant Pathol.
,
19
,
227
237
.

25.

Krajaejun
,
T.
,
Rujirawat
,
T.
,
Kanpanleuk
,
T.
et al.  (
2018
)
Biochemical and genetic analyses of the oomycete Pythium insidiosum provide new insights into clinical identification and urease-based evolution of metabolism-related traits
.
PeerJ
,
6
,
e4821
.

26.

Kittichotirat
,
W.
,
Bumgarner
,
R.E.
,
Asikainen
,
S.
et al.  (
2011
)
Identification of the pangenome and its components in 14 distinct Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains by comparative genomic analysis
.
PLoS One
,
6
,
e22420
.

27.

Tatusov
,
R.L.
,
Fedorova
,
N.D.
,
Jackson
,
J.D.
et al.  (
2003
)
The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes
.
BMC Bioinformatics
,
4
,
41
.

28.

Galperin
,
M.Y.
,
Makarova
,
K.S.
,
Wolf
,
Y.I.
et al.  (
2015
)
Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
43
,
D261
D269
.

29.

Jiang
,
R.H.Y.
,
Tyler
,
B.M.
,
Whisson
,
S.C.
et al.  (
2006
)
Ancient origin of elicitin gene clusters in Phytophthora genomes
.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
,
23
,
338
351
.

30.

Jiang
,
R.H.Y.
,
Dawe
,
A.L.
,
Weide
,
R.
et al.  (
2005
)
Elicitin genes in Phytophthora infestans are clustered and interspersed with various transposon-like elements
.
Mol. Genet. Genomics
,
273
,
20
32
.

31.

PanabiÈRes
,
F.
,
Ponchet
,
M.
,
Allasia
,
V.
et al.  (
1997
)
Characterization of border species among Pythiaceae: several Pythium isolates produce elicitins, typical proteins from Phytophthora spp
.
Mycol. Res.
,
101
,
1459
1468
.

32.

Cox
,
G.M.
,
Mukherjee
,
J.
,
Cole
,
G.T.
et al.  (
2000
)
Urease as a virulence factor in experimental cryptococcosis
.
Infect. Immun.
,
68
,
443
448
.

33.

Rutherford
,
J.C.
(
2014
)
The emerging role of urease as a general microbial virulence factor
.
PLoS Pathog.
,
10
,
e1004062
.

34.

Mora
,
D.
and
Arioli
,
S.
(
2014
)
Microbial urease in health and disease
.
PLoS Pathog.
,
10
,
e1004472
.

35.

Witte
,
C.-P.
,
Rosso
,
M.G.
and
Romeis
,
T.
(
2005
)
Identification of three urease accessory proteins that are required for urease activation in Arabidopsis
.
Plant Physiol.
,
139
,
1155
1162
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.