Abstract

Pangenomes, capturing the genetic diversity of a species or genus, are essential to understanding the ecology, pathobiology and evolutionary mechanisms of fungi that cause infection in crops and humans. However, fungal pangenome databases remain unavailable. Here, we report the first fungal pangenome database, specifically for Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC), a group of cross-kingdom pathogens causing devastating vascular wilt to over 100 plant species and life-threatening fusariosis to immunocompromised humans. The F. oxysporum Pangenome Database (FoPGDB) is a comprehensive resource integrating 35 high-quality FOSC genomes, coupled with robust analytical tools. FoPGDB allows for both gene-based and graph-based exploration of the F. oxysporum pangenome. It also curates a large repository of putative effector sequences, crucial for understanding the mechanisms of FOSC pathogenicity. With an assortment of functionalities including gene search, genomic variant exploration and tools for functional enrichment, FoPGDB provides a platform for in-depth investigations of the genetic diversity and adaptability of F. oxysporum. The modular and user-friendly interface ensures efficient data access and interpretation. FoPGDB promises to be a valuable resource for F. oxysporum research, contributing to our understanding of this pathogen’s pangenomic landscape and aiding in the development of novel disease management strategies.

Database URL: http://www.fopgdb.site

Introduction

Fungal pathogens are eukaryotic microbes and major causal agents of devastating plant diseases threatening crop yields and food security. Many of them are also producers of mycotoxins poisoning agricultural produce and triggering genetic disorders such as cancers. Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC) is a group of soil-borne filamentous fungal pathogens that cause devastating diseases in a wide range of plants, impacting global agricultural production (1–3). F. oxysporum infects the vascular system of host plants, leading to wilt, necrosis and ultimately plant death (3). FOSC has shown remarkable adaptability, with numerous formae speciales capable of infecting specific plant species or cultivars. As a result, it poses a significant threat to various economically important crops, including banana, tomato, cotton, melons, chickpea, crucifers and many others. It can also infect animals, causing fatal infection in immunocompromised humans (4, 5). The genomes of FOSC are highly variable due to the presence of various numbers of accessory chromosomes horizontally transferred among different FOSC strains, making them one of the most genetically diverse fungal pathogens. One of the main players in the plant–pathogen interface is the effectors, a group of small secreted proteins (2). F. oxysporum effectors are recruited during the infection course and play important roles in manipulating and evading the host’s immune system, ensuring the success of the fungal infection. The F. oxysporum accessory chromosomes are enriched with effectors and rich in repetitive elements primarily composed of transposable elements (TEs) whose active transposition leads to quick evolution of effectors and thus pathogenicity. Understanding the biology of the effectors not only provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of FOSC pathogenicity but also holds promise for the development of new strategies to control this devastating fungal pathogen.

Single-reference genome-based research provides a limited look into the organism’s adaptation. Therefore, genomic research has slowly shifted its paradigm from single genome to pangenomes which represent the genetic diversity of a species or genus, in order to overcome the reference bias (6). Given the quick evolution of F. oxysporum virulence, compartmentalized genome structure and importance of pangenomes, building a pangenome reference from high-quality F. oxysporum genome assemblies is essential to understanding the genetic diversity and evolution of pathogenicity for disease control. Many genome assemblies have been reported for F. oxysporum strains in recent years with 35 genomes with scaffold-level assemblies available in public domains such as National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank and Joint Genome Institute (JGI). However, no graph pangenome reference has been available for F. oxysporum which has limited the integration and application of these genomic resources for pathobiological studies. Similar strategies have been employed for F. oxysporum as well (7, 8). The pangenomic approach is especially desirable for the compartmentalized genomes of FOSC (9) given their genetic diversity, host specificity and ability to quickly adapt to diverse environments. The pangenomes can be presented either as linear forms which contain the nonredundant sequences of all genomes or as a graph which utilizes graph data structure to store sequences and their relationships as nodes and edges, respectively. One tool that can help researchers to untangle the genome of FOSC is graph-based pangenomes (10). These powerful tools facilitate structural variation (SV) studies and can help us understand the genome plasticity of the F. oxysporum genome.

Here, we report a database for the gene-based and graph-based pangenome of the FOSC which the users can access and search the data and analysis and utilize various tools. The database contains 35 high-quality publicly available annotated genome sequences, putative effector sequences, core and dispensable gene categories, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment tools, genome browser, etc. We also report the first pangenome graph for FOSC that can be downloaded or browsed on the website.

Materials and methods

Data

To construct the FOSC pangenome, we collected 35 high-quality genomes of plant pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains as well as clinical isolates of F. oxysporum. The genomes were selected and downloaded from NCBI (9 genomes), JGI (24 genomes) or National Genomics Data Center(2 genomes) if assembled using at least one type of third-generation sequencing data such as PacBio circular consensus sequencing (CCS) or Oxford Nanopore sequencing reads and with genome annotations (Table 1) (11–21). The genome sizes range between 48.4 and 73.3 Mb, with a mean contig N50 of 3.6 Mb, while the numbers of genes range from 15 519 to 21 781.

Table 1.

Statistics of the genome used to construct the FoPGDB

GenomeGenome size (Mb)N50
(Mb)
Gene numberReference
F. oxysporum f. sp. albedinis isolate 965.62.919 411(18)
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-2358.04.218 527np
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-3356.71.118 076np
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-7258.16.018 933np
F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae FoC_Fus2_v153.44.118 852(12)
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense Foc1 6048.64.715 865(16)
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense FocTR4 5848.44.415 519(16)
F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 428755.64.117 932np
F. oxysporum f. sp. matthiolae PHW72657.20.817 996(17)
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F10571.50.819 358np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F10967.11.019 272np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F2373.30.720 063np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F7967.00.919 180np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi T41555.83.618 001np
F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-cucumerinum Forc01652.94.516 795(14)
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum 15-2J64.54.418 377np
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum ME2349.94.916 610np
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Tm261.14.717 844np
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense II549.44.516 048(21)
F. oxysporum F10-0356.64.617 114np
F. oxysporum F10-0457.95.818 482np
F. oxysporum F10-0856.04.317 958np
F. oxysporum F10-1053.03.916 942np
F. oxysporum F2-0156.63.617 966np
F. oxysporum F2-0255.45.317 736np
F. oxysporum F2-0456.64.517 876np
F. oxysporum F2-0655.34.817 672np
F. oxysporum F2-0754.04.717 461np
F. oxysporum Fo4750.44.517 426(13)
F. oxysporum Fo517668.44.121 683(20)
F. oxysporum MPI-CAGE-CH-021255.74.817 726(15)
F. oxysporum MPI-SDFR-AT-009452.21.617 445(15)
F. oxysporum MRL899650.11.716 631(19)
F. oxysporum NRRL 26 36548.50.716 047np
F. oxysporum f. sp. conglutinans Cong1-172.24.921 781(11)
GenomeGenome size (Mb)N50
(Mb)
Gene numberReference
F. oxysporum f. sp. albedinis isolate 965.62.919 411(18)
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-2358.04.218 527np
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-3356.71.118 076np
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-7258.16.018 933np
F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae FoC_Fus2_v153.44.118 852(12)
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense Foc1 6048.64.715 865(16)
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense FocTR4 5848.44.415 519(16)
F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 428755.64.117 932np
F. oxysporum f. sp. matthiolae PHW72657.20.817 996(17)
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F10571.50.819 358np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F10967.11.019 272np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F2373.30.720 063np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F7967.00.919 180np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi T41555.83.618 001np
F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-cucumerinum Forc01652.94.516 795(14)
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum 15-2J64.54.418 377np
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum ME2349.94.916 610np
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Tm261.14.717 844np
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense II549.44.516 048(21)
F. oxysporum F10-0356.64.617 114np
F. oxysporum F10-0457.95.818 482np
F. oxysporum F10-0856.04.317 958np
F. oxysporum F10-1053.03.916 942np
F. oxysporum F2-0156.63.617 966np
F. oxysporum F2-0255.45.317 736np
F. oxysporum F2-0456.64.517 876np
F. oxysporum F2-0655.34.817 672np
F. oxysporum F2-0754.04.717 461np
F. oxysporum Fo4750.44.517 426(13)
F. oxysporum Fo517668.44.121 683(20)
F. oxysporum MPI-CAGE-CH-021255.74.817 726(15)
F. oxysporum MPI-SDFR-AT-009452.21.617 445(15)
F. oxysporum MRL899650.11.716 631(19)
F. oxysporum NRRL 26 36548.50.716 047np
F. oxysporum f. sp. conglutinans Cong1-172.24.921 781(11)

np: unpublished.

Table 1.

Statistics of the genome used to construct the FoPGDB

GenomeGenome size (Mb)N50
(Mb)
Gene numberReference
F. oxysporum f. sp. albedinis isolate 965.62.919 411(18)
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-2358.04.218 527np
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-3356.71.118 076np
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-7258.16.018 933np
F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae FoC_Fus2_v153.44.118 852(12)
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense Foc1 6048.64.715 865(16)
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense FocTR4 5848.44.415 519(16)
F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 428755.64.117 932np
F. oxysporum f. sp. matthiolae PHW72657.20.817 996(17)
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F10571.50.819 358np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F10967.11.019 272np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F2373.30.720 063np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F7967.00.919 180np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi T41555.83.618 001np
F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-cucumerinum Forc01652.94.516 795(14)
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum 15-2J64.54.418 377np
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum ME2349.94.916 610np
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Tm261.14.717 844np
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense II549.44.516 048(21)
F. oxysporum F10-0356.64.617 114np
F. oxysporum F10-0457.95.818 482np
F. oxysporum F10-0856.04.317 958np
F. oxysporum F10-1053.03.916 942np
F. oxysporum F2-0156.63.617 966np
F. oxysporum F2-0255.45.317 736np
F. oxysporum F2-0456.64.517 876np
F. oxysporum F2-0655.34.817 672np
F. oxysporum F2-0754.04.717 461np
F. oxysporum Fo4750.44.517 426(13)
F. oxysporum Fo517668.44.121 683(20)
F. oxysporum MPI-CAGE-CH-021255.74.817 726(15)
F. oxysporum MPI-SDFR-AT-009452.21.617 445(15)
F. oxysporum MRL899650.11.716 631(19)
F. oxysporum NRRL 26 36548.50.716 047np
F. oxysporum f. sp. conglutinans Cong1-172.24.921 781(11)
GenomeGenome size (Mb)N50
(Mb)
Gene numberReference
F. oxysporum f. sp. albedinis isolate 965.62.919 411(18)
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-2358.04.218 527np
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-3356.71.118 076np
F. oxysporum f. sp. basilici Amherst-7258.16.018 933np
F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae FoC_Fus2_v153.44.118 852(12)
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense Foc1 6048.64.715 865(16)
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense FocTR4 5848.44.415 519(16)
F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 428755.64.117 932np
F. oxysporum f. sp. matthiolae PHW72657.20.817 996(17)
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F10571.50.819 358np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F10967.11.019 272np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F2373.30.720 063np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi F7967.00.919 180np
F. oxysporum f. sp. pisi T41555.83.618 001np
F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-cucumerinum Forc01652.94.516 795(14)
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum 15-2J64.54.418 377np
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum ME2349.94.916 610np
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Tm261.14.717 844np
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense II549.44.516 048(21)
F. oxysporum F10-0356.64.617 114np
F. oxysporum F10-0457.95.818 482np
F. oxysporum F10-0856.04.317 958np
F. oxysporum F10-1053.03.916 942np
F. oxysporum F2-0156.63.617 966np
F. oxysporum F2-0255.45.317 736np
F. oxysporum F2-0456.64.517 876np
F. oxysporum F2-0655.34.817 672np
F. oxysporum F2-0754.04.717 461np
F. oxysporum Fo4750.44.517 426(13)
F. oxysporum Fo517668.44.121 683(20)
F. oxysporum MPI-CAGE-CH-021255.74.817 726(15)
F. oxysporum MPI-SDFR-AT-009452.21.617 445(15)
F. oxysporum MRL899650.11.716 631(19)
F. oxysporum NRRL 26 36548.50.716 047np
F. oxysporum f. sp. conglutinans Cong1-172.24.921 781(11)

np: unpublished.

Gene and repeat annotations

KEGG and GO terms were annotated via eggnog-mapper (22, 23). In addition, the putative effector proteins in all genomes were annotated using SignalP version 5.0b (24), TargetP version 2.0 (25) and EffectorP version 3.0 (26). Briefly, the intersecting proteins between the secreted proteins detected by SignalP and TargetP, and the predicted effectors by EffectorP were annotated as putative effectors. In total, 20 728 putative effectors have been identified. The repeats were identified de novo by RepeatModeller (version 2.0.3) (27) using universal Repbase database and automatically curated by MCHelper (28) using default parameters. RepeatMasker (version 4.1.2-p1) (29) was used to annotate the repetitive elements in the genome using curated TE library.

Gene-based pangenome

Orthofinder was used to cluster 628 715 protein sequences from 35 genomes into 29 569 gene families. The single-copy orthologs were used to generate a maximum-likelihood tree with Fusarium graminearum (GenBank accession: GCA_000240135.3) as outgroup. Clustered families were divided into five categories: core (present in all 35 genomes, 30.4% of the families), soft-core (present in exactly 34 genomes, 6.2%), dispensable (present in 3 to 33 genomes, 32.3%), peripheral (present in 2 or 3 genomes, 14.5%) and private (present in only 1 genome, 16.6%).

We performed KEGG and GO enrichment analyses of the genes in five categories, with distinct terms of significant enrichment. For example, while in the core category, conserved biological processes such as protein biosynthesis, ubiquitination, and DNA synthesis genes were enriched, the dispensable, peripheral, and private categories were enriched in diverse terms such as intracellular distribution of mitochondria, calcium ion import into vacuole, long-chain fatty acid metabolic process, or gamma-aminobutyric metabolic process. It must be noted that the annotated gene ratios for these categories were significantly lower than core and soft-core categories.

Graph-based pangenome

The graph pangenome was constructed using two methods for different purposes. A SV graph was generated using Minigraph (version 0.19-r551) (29), with tomato pathogen Fol4287 as reference and otherwise default parameters. It contained 94 447 254 bases, 47 752 nodes and 60 911 edges and can be browsed using VPRG (https://github.com/codeatcg/VRPG). The main variation graph was generated using the Cactus-Minigraph pipeline (version 2.6.4) (30) with tomato pathogen Fol4287 as the reference and otherwise default parameters. It contains 694 513 706 bases, 18 390 096 nodes and 24 944 941 edges. The differences between the two versions reflect the complexity of the Cactus-Minigraph graph. vg deconstruct (version 1.43.0) (31) was used to call variants with all 35 genomes as reference. For Fol4287 as reference, a total of 1 575 210 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and small insertions and deletions (INDELs) and 17 677 SVs were detected. The variants can be browsed using JBrowse (see later).

Genome alignments

Genome alignments were carried out using the Minimap2 (version 2.24) (32), which facilitated the alignment of the F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 4287 genome with those of the other 34 genomes in our dataset. To provide a comprehensive overview of the alignment results, we employed the D-GENIES visualization tool (33). These alignments can be explored in details within the ‘Align’ under ‘Tools’ module.

Database implementation

The FoPGD, a robust pangenomic analysis platform for F. oxysporum, leveraged a range of technologies and frameworks for its construction and operation (Figure 1). For the construction of the Home and About Us pages and the implementation of BLAST and JBrowse in the Tools module, F. oxysporum Pangenome Database (FoPGDB) utilized Tripal (http://tripal.info/), a toolkit specifically designed for constructing online genomic and genetic databases. The web pages of FoPGDB were developed using HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) and JavaScript and administrated via Drupal, a PHP (Hypertext Preprocessor)-based website management system. The biological data were imported into the database utilizing the Generic Model Organism Database Project/Chado (34–36) schema, a widely used database schema for biological information. For the Search module, with the exception of the orthogroup search, the platform employed the Nginx (https://nginx.org/) web server, in conjunction with PHP, HTML5 and JavaScript as programming languages. For the organization, storage and management of data, FoPGDB deployed MySQL (https://www.mysql.com). Additionally, the AJAX asynchronous loading scheme was incorporated to enhance data loading efficiency and streamline function implementation. The remaining sections, including the pangenome, orthogroup search page and KEGG and GO enrichment tools, utilized Django (https://www.djangoproject.com), a high-level Python web framework. These pages incorporated HTML, CSS and JavaScript for front-end design. Data storage and manipulation were facilitated by pandas (https://pandas.pydata.org), an open-source data analysis and manipulation library renowned for its speed, flexibility and ease of use. Moreover, ClusterProfiler (37), an R package for the statistical analysis and visualization of functional profiles, and VRPG, an interactive web viewer for reference pangenome graphs, were implemented.

Figure 1.

The framework, core system and programming language of FOPGDB.

Results

The FoPGDB website was organized into five main modules: the ‘Home’ module which contains general information as well as shortcuts to ‘Search’ and ‘Tools’ modules, ‘Pangenome’ module where the data and the analysis are hosted, ‘Search’ and ‘Tools’ modules which contain tools related to gene searches and alignments, genome browsers and genome alignments, ‘Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)’ module, and finally the ‘About Us’ module where more information about the website is provided as well as contact information (Figure 1). In addition to the main modules, ‘External Links’ contains quick access links to third-party tools.

Home, FAQ, and About Us

The ‘Home’ page contains a short description of the database and quick access links to the ‘Pangenome’, ‘Search’ and ‘Tools’ modules (Figure 2). The background image is an artistic rendering of different FOSC strains in various media plates. In ‘FAQ’ module, we answer possible questions about the database and give a quick overview of the Tools. The ‘About Us’ module has more information about the database and contact information.

Figure 2.

The homepage of FoPGDB.

Pangenome

The framework of the current study encompasses three principal components within the Pangenome module: ‘Genomes’, ‘Pangenome Analysis’ and ‘VRPG’.

Genomes

The ‘Genomes’ module delivers an exhaustive table depicting the genomes deployed for the study, accompanied by assembly statistics, references and immediate access to NCBI, National Genomics Data Center or JGI for the procurement of relevant data. Moreover, an integrated search function situated at the upper-right corner of the table facilitates effective data extraction from the entire dataset. To enhance user convenience, the table is equipped with a header-based sorting mechanism, thereby expediting the search and identification process for desired information.

Pangenome Analysis

The ‘Pangenome Analysis’ subdivision incorporates a ‘jump to section’ navigation bar, tactically placed beneath the primary menu (Figure 3A). This assists users in swiftly accessing specific sections of interest. The navigation bar is partitioned into four modules: ‘Phylogenetic Tree’, ‘Pan-genome Analysis’, ‘Effectors’ and ‘Pangenome Graph’ (Figure 3B–E) The initial three modules provide insights into the phylogenetic tree of the 35 FOSC genomes, particulars of the pangenome analysis and the distribution of effectors, respectively. Within the ‘Pangenome Graph’ section, users can visualize an overview of the pangenome graph and have the option to download the Graphical Fragment Assembly file and the Variant Call Format file, with Fol4287 serving as the reference genome. A concealment option, integrated into the title bar of each module, gives users enhanced content control.

Figure 3.

The Pangenome Analysis section under the Pangenome module. (A) Quick access links. (B) Maximum-likelihood tree using single-copy orthologous protein sequences in 35 Fusarium oxysporum genomes. Fusarium graminearum was used as an outgroup. (C) (Top left) Modeling of pangenome and core-genome sizes as additional genomes of F. oxysporum pangenome are added. (Top right) The distribution and ratios of the pangenome gene family categories in 35 accessions. The ‘core’ genes are those present in all accessions, ‘softcore’ genes are present in 34 accessions, ‘dispensable’ genes are present in more than 3 but less than 34 accessions, ‘peripheral’ genes are present in 2 to 3 accessions and ‘private’ genes are present in only 1 accession. (Center) Presence and absence of pangenome gene families in the 35 F. oxysporum genomes. (Bottom) Violin plots showing gene sizes (left), exon numbers (middle) and CDS lengths (right) of the genes in the core, soft-core, dispensable, peripheral and private categories. (D) Numbers of effectors in each genome. (E) Visualization of the chromosomes in the graph genome with Bandage.

VRPG

The ‘Pangenome’ module further introduces a specialized subdivision named ‘VRPG’ (Figure 4). This provides an interactive and intuitive platform for visualizing the pangenome graph of F. oxysporum. The platform enables users to select specific regions of interest within the pangenome graph and refine image through easy-to-use input boxes and buttons. For improved visualization, a selection box allows for the highlighting of the genome used in constructing the pangenome graph. Customization features include the layout and simplification style of the visualized pangenome graph, thus offering customized visualizations. A unique function within this section allows users to click on small sequences within the graph and retrieve information about their positions and potential instances of these sequences in other genomes used to create the pangenome graph. An option to save the pangenome graph as an Scalable Vector Graphics image has been integrated.

Figure 4.

VRPG section under the Pangenome module shows a section in the graph pangenome.

Search

The FoPGDB provides a sophisticated ‘Search’ section to facilitate the exploration of genes via gene IDs or specific genomic coordinates. This section comprises six robust search tools: ‘Batch Search’, ‘Gene Search By Location’, ‘Effector Search’, ‘Orthogroup Search’, ‘KEGG Annotation Search’ and ‘GO Annotation Search’ (Figure 6).

Batch Search and Effector Search

The ‘Batch Search’ tool offers an efficient method for the retrieval of essential gene-related information, including gene categories, genomic locations, protein sequences and coding DNA sequences (CDS) (Figure 5A and B). Notably, the CDS information can be instrumental in designing PCR primers. Users can input gene IDs directly into a designated field or upload a file containing multiple gene IDs to use the ‘Batch Search’ feature. Similarly, the ‘Effector Search’ functionality also operates via the direct input of gene IDs or by uploading a file containing multiple gene IDs (Figure 5C and D). It allows users to access the effector prediction results associated with the provided gene IDs. These predictions are formulated based on algorithms such as SignalP, TargetP and EffectorP.

Figure 5.

The Search module sections. (A, B) Search page and result page of Batch Search, (C, D) Search page and result page of effector search, (E, F) Search page and result page of Gene Search By Location, (G) Search page and result page of Orthogroup search.

Gene Search By Location

The ‘Gene Search By Location’ function is designed to streamline the gene identification process within a specified genomic region (Figure 5E and F). Users can determine the genome and chromosome of interest from a selection box and enter the start and end positions in a separate input box, thus narrowing the genomic region for the search.

Orthogroup Search

The ‘Orthogroup Search’ offers a resource for users to examine orthologous genes across species (Figure 5G). Researchers may input a gene ID into the left-hand input box to visualize the distribution of orthologous genes within a phylogenetic tree. The database also allows the download of all gene information within an orthogroup in CSV format.

KEGG Annotation Search and GO Annotation Search

The ‘KEGG Annotation Search’ and ‘GO Annotation Search’ tools allow users to explore the KEGG pathway and GO term annotations for selected genes, respectively. These tools can enhance the understanding of gene function by providing direct access to KEGG and GO data upon gene ID entry. To optimize user interactions, sample gene lists are provided for the ‘Search’ subsections that require gene ID input. Users can populate the input box with a sample gene list by clicking the ‘example’ button. Further enhancing functionality, the database enables the download of search results in CSV format, providing a practical solution for data analysis and archiving.

Tools

The ‘Tools’ module represents a pivotal component of our pangenome database, providing users with an array of powerful and user-friendly functionalities. This section is divided into five distinct and specialized subsections, namely: ‘BLAST’, ‘JBrowse’, ‘KEGG Enrichment’, ‘GO Enrichment’ and ‘Align’.

BLAST

To create local BLAST databases from the genome sequences, transcript sequences, protein sequences and TE sequences of the 35 F. oxysporum genomes, we utilized NCBI BLAST version 2.10.1+ (38). Employing the ‘tripal_blast’ module (https://github.com/tripal/tripal_blast), we developed an intuitive interface for BLAST searches (Figure 6A). The BLAST search results are presented as an expandable summary table, with each hit listed as a row, providing essential information such as query sequence ID, subject sequence ID and e-value (Figure 6B). For detailed alignment information, including hit visualization and high-scoring pairs between query and subject sequences, users can easily unfold the rows. Moreover, users have the option to download the BLAST search results in various formats, including BLAST pairwise format, BLAST tabular format, GFF3 and BLAST XML format.

Figure 6.

BLAST section under the Tools module. (A) BLAST search page. (B) BLAST result page.

JBrowse

Incorporating JBrowse, a versatile genome browser supporting interactive access and visualization of various genomic features (39), we have crafted a custom JBrowse for each of the 35 genomes (Figure 7). Within each genome’s JBrowse, five tracks are offered, including genome sequences, gene models, repeats, SNPs and INDELs and SVs (Figure 7A and B). The genome structure, gene models and repeats provide insights into chromosomal locations, gene structures and sequences. As for the SNP&INDEL and SV track, derived from the pangenome graph using each genome as a reference with vg deconstruct, users can effortlessly explore SNPs, INDELs and SVs for the reference sequence in comparison with the pangenome graph. By clicking on specific variants within the ‘SNP&INDEL’ track and ‘SV’ track (Figure 7C–E), users can access information regarding chromosome locations, variation types and frequencies among the 35 genomes. For example, we investigated the methylation-related SNPs, INDELs and SVs located in the gene Fol4287_gene_849, allowing us to view gene position, length and sequence by clicking on the gene model (Figure 7C).

Figure 7.

JBrowse section under the Tools module. (A) Page of genome browser index, (B) available tracks for different types of genomic features, (C) a window showing detailed information of the target gene model, (D) TE information, (E) SNPs and INDELs information for 35 Fusarium oxysporum accessions, (F) SVs’ information for 35 F. oxysporum accessions.

KEGG enrichment and GO enrichment

Functional enrichment analysis represents a potent method for extracting meaningful biological insights from gene data. To assist users in capturing essential biological information related to genes, we have implemented KEGG and GO enrichment analysis tools based on the functional annotations described earlier and the clusterProfiler R package (Figure 8A–D). Users can easily input a list of genes of interest or upload a file containing gene lists to perform enrichment analyses. The results offer significantly enriched functional categories, providing valuable insights into the potential biological processes associated with the selected genes.

Figure 8.

(A, B) Search page and result page of KEGG enrichment, (C, D) Search page and result page of GO Enrichment, (E, F) Search page and result page of Alignment.

Genome Alignment Tool

Pairwise genome alignments can be visualized under Align section for the genomes in FoPGDB. Users can select the genome to align with the reference genome, Fol4287, and view and interact with the dot plot generated by D-Genies (33). The alignments can also be downloaded as pairwise mapping format file (Figure 8E and F).

Discussion

The FoPGDB has been developed as a robust and comprehensive resource for the fungal research community, particularly those interested in the study of the FOSC. FoPGDB incorporated 35 high-quality annotated genomes of FOSC, a vast repository of putative effector sequences, and a multitude of tools to facilitate gene-based and graph-based exploration of the FOSC pangenome. Using FoPGDB, one can align their gene of interest to BLAST databases, search the hit genes in the pangenome database using batch search, determine if they are effectors using effector search, browse the genomic region and search for variations using JBrowse and interactively inspect the genomic region using VRPG. The efficient search module and advanced toolsets allow for the detailed investigation of the genetic diversity, adaptability and pathogenicity of F. oxysporum.

As we look ahead, we plan to continually update and expand FoPGDB to enhance its utility and relevance for F. oxysporum research. Future additions will aim to incorporate more genomes as they become available, update the database with new effector sequences and improve the analytical tools based on user feedback and technological advancements. This will enable researchers to delve deeper into the pangenomic landscape of this pathogen, thereby facilitating the development of innovative disease management strategies. We believe that FoPGDB holds immense potential to propel the field of Fusarium research forward, by aiding in the exploration of genomic diversity and shedding light on the underlying mechanisms of pathogenicity.

Data availability

Data are available at FoPGDB (http://www.fopgdb.site) online.

Author contributions

T.M.: conceptualization, data curation, software, formal analysis, validation, methodology, validation, writing—original draft. H.J.: software, validation. Y.Z.: software, validation. Y.Z.: software, validation. S.C.: data curation. X.W.: visualization. B.Y.: visualization. J.S.: visualization. X.G.: data curation. D.H.A.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, validation, methodology, L.G.: conceptualization, resources, funding acquisition, writing—review & editing.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Li-Jun Ma from the University of Massachusetts Amherst and Sajeet Haridas from JGI for providing us with unpublished data and the Bioinformatics Platform at Peking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences for providing high-performance computing resources.

Funding

The Key R&D Program of Shandong Province (ZR202211070163); The Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shandong Province (ZR2023JQ010); Young Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (L.G.).

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

1.

Dean
R.
,
Van Kan
J.A.L.
,
Pretorius
Z.A.
 et al.  (
2012
)
The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology
.
Mol. Plant Pathol.
,
13
,
414
430
.

2.

Ma
L.-J.
,
Geiser
D.M.
,
Proctor
R.H.
 et al.  (
2013
)
Fusarium pathogenomics
.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
,
67
,
399
416
.

3.

Gordon
T.R.
(
2017
)
Fusarium oxysporum and the Fusarium Wilt Syndrome
.
Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.
,
55
,
23
39
.

4.

Nucci
M.
and
Anaissie
E.
(
2007
)
Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients
.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
,
20
,
695
704
.

5.

Guarro
J.
(
2013
)
Fusariosis, a complex infection caused by a high diversity of fungal species refractory to treatment
.
Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
,
32
,
1491
1500
.

6.

Sherman
R.M.
and
Salzberg
S.L.
(
2020
)
Pan-genomics in the human genome era
.
Nat. Rev. Genet.
,
21
,
243
254
.

7.

Fayyaz
A.
,
Robinson
G.
,
Chang
P.L.
 et al.  (
2023
)
Hiding in plain sight: genome-wide recombination and a dynamic accessory genome drive diversity in Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
,
120
, e2220570120.

8.

Ayada
H.
,
Dhioui
B.
,
Mazouz
H.
 et al.  (
2022
)
In silico comparative genomic analysis unravels a new candidate protein arsenal specifically associated with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis pathogenesis
.
Sci. Rep.
,
12
, 19098.

9.

Yang
H.
,
Yu
H.
and
Ma
L.-J.
(
2020
)
Accessory chromosomes in Fusarium oxysporum
.
Phytopathology
,
110
,
1488
1496
.

10.

Eizenga
J.M.
,
Novak
A.M.
,
Sibbesen
J.A.
 et al.  (
2020
)
Pangenome graphs
.
Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.
,
21
,
139
162
.

11.

Ayukawa
Y.
,
Asai
S.
,
Gan
P.
 et al.  (
2021
)
A pair of effectors encoded on a conditionally dispensable chromosome of Fusarium oxysporum suppress host-specific immunity
.
Commun. Biol.
,
4
, 707.

12.

Armitage
A.D.
,
Taylor
A.
,
Sobczyk
M.K.
 et al.  (
2018
)
Characterisation of pathogen-specific regions and novel effector candidates in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae
.
Sci. Rep.
,
8
, 13530.

13.

Wang
B.
,
Yu
H.
,
Jia
Y.
 et al.  (
2020
)
Chromosome-scale genome assembly of Fusarium oxysporum strain Fo47, a fungal endophyte and biocontrol agent
.
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions
,
33
,
1108
1111
.

14.

Van Dam
P.
,
Fokkens
L.
,
Schmidt
S.M.
 et al.  (
2016
)
Effector profiles distinguish Formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporum
.
Environ. Microbiol.
,
18
,
4087
4102
.

15.

Mesny
F.
,
Miyauchi
S.
,
Thiergart
T.
 et al.  (
2021
)
Genetic determinants of endophytism in the Arabidopsis root mycobiome
.
Nat. Commun.
,
12
, 7227.

16.

Yun
Y.
,
Song
A.
,
Bao
J.
 et al.  (
2019
)
Genome data of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 1 and tropical race 4 isolates using long-read sequencing
.
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions
,
32
,
1270
1272
.

17.

Yu
H.
,
Ayhan
D.H.
,
Diener
A.C.
 et al.  (
2020
)
Genome sequence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. matthiolae, a Brassicaceae pathogen
.
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions
,
33
,
569
572
.

18.

Khoulassa
S.
,
Elmoualij
B.
,
Benlyas
M.
 et al.  (
2022
)
High-quality draft nuclear and mitochondrial genome sequence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis strain 9, the causal agent of Bayoud disease on date palm
.
Plant Dis.
,
106
,
1974
1976
.

19.

Zhang
Y.
,
Yang
H.
,
Turra
D.
 et al.  (
2020
)
The genome of opportunistic fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum carries a unique set of lineage-specific chromosomes
.
Commun. Biol.
,
3
, 50.

20.

Fokkens
L.
,
Guo
L.
,
Dora
S.
 et al.  (
2020
)
A chromosome-scale genome assembly for the Fusarium oxysporum strain Fo5176 to establish a model Arabidopsis-fungal pathosystem
.
G3
,
10
,
3549
3555
.

21.

Ma
L.-J.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Li
C.
 et al.  (
2023
)
Accessory genes in tropical race 4 contributed to the recent resurgence of the devastating disease of Fusarium wilt of banana
 
Res Sq [Preprint]
.

22.

Cantalapiedra
C.P.
,
Hernández-Plaza
A.
,
Letunic
I.
 et al.  (
2021
)
eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale
.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
,
38
,
5825
5829
.

23.

Huerta-Cepas
J.
,
Szklarczyk
D.
,
Heller
D.
 et al.  (
2019
)
eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
47
,
D309
D314
.

24.

Almagro Armenteros
J.J.
,
Tsirigos
K.D.
,
Sønderby
C.K.
 et al.  (
2019
)
SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks
.
Nat. Biotechnol.
,
37
,
420
423
.

25.

Almagro Armenteros
J.J.
,
Salvatore
M.
,
Emanuelsson
O.
 et al.  (
2019
)
Detecting sequence signals in targeting peptides using deep learning
.
Life Sci Alliance
,
2
, e201900429.

26.

Sperschneider
J.
and
Dodds
P.N.
(
2022
)
EffectorP 3.0: prediction of apoplastic and cytoplasmic effectors in fungi and oomycetes
.
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions
,
35
,
146
156
.

27.

Flynn
J.M.
,
Hubley
R.
,
Goubert
C.
 et al.  (
2020
)
RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
,
117
,
9451
9457
.

28.

Orozco-Arias
S.
,
Sierra
P.
,
Durbin
R.
 et al.  (
2023
)
MCHelper automatically curates transposable element libraries across species
. bioRxiv 2023.10.17.562682.

29.

Smit
A.F.A.
,
Hubley
R.
and
Green
P.
(
2013
)
RepeatMasker Open-4.0
.

30.

Hickey
G.
,
Monlong
J.
,
Ebler
J.
 et al.  (
2023
)
Pangenome graph construction from genome alignments with Minigraph-Cactus
.
Nat. Biotechnol.

31.

Garrison
E.
,
Sirén
J.
,
Novak
A.M.
 et al.  (
2018
)
Variation graph toolkit improves read mapping by representing genetic variation in the reference
.
Nat. Biotechnol.
,
36
,
875
879
.

32.

Li
H.
and
Birol
I.
(
2018
)
Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences
.
Bioinformatics
,
34
,
3094
3100
.

33.

Cabanettes
F.
and
Klopp
C.
(
2018
)
D-GENIES: dot plot large genomes in an interactive, efficient and simple way
.
PeerJ
,
6
, e4958.

34.

Ficklin
S.P.
,
Sanderson
L.-A.
,
Cheng
C.-H.
 et al.  (
2011
)
Tripal: a construction toolkit for online genome databases
.
Database
,
2011
, bar044.

35.

Sanderson
L.-A.
,
Ficklin
S.P.
,
Cheng
C.-H.
 et al.  (
2013
)
Tripal v1.1: a standards-based toolkit for construction of online genetic and genomic databases
.
Database
,
2013
:bat075.

36.

Staton
M.
,
Cannon
E.
,
Sanderson
L.-A.
 et al.  (
2021
)
Tripal, a community update after 10 years of supporting open source, standards-based genetic, genomic and breeding databases
.
Brief Bioinform.
,
22
, bbab238.

37.

Yu
G.
,
Wang
L.-G.
,
Han
Y.
 et al.  (
2012
)
clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters
.
Omics J. Integr. Biol.
,
16
,
284
287
.

38.

Altschul
S.F.
,
Gish
W.
,
Miller
W.
 et al.  (
1990
)
Basic local alignment search tool
.
J. Mol. Biol.
,
215
,
403
410
.

39.

Buels
R.
,
Yao
E.
,
Diesh
C.M.
 et al.  (
2016
)
JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis
.
Genome Biol.
,
17
, 66.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.